Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Vigneault "out-thought himself" by changing Canucks' lineup against the Capitals?

From Tony Gallagher at the Province:

For one night at least, it was back to reality for the Canucks and their fans.
And while there were a lot of factors that played into Monday 's disastrous replay of the Alamo with the Canucks in the roles of Daniel Boone and Jim Bowie, perhaps coach Alain Vigneault outthinking himself contributed to the remorseless cuffing.
Then again, maybe they were so bad nothing would have mattered.
...
What Vigneault apparently did not take into consideration was the fact that with both Hordichuk and Bieksa out of the lineup, the physical edge the Canucks have enjoyed over teams vanished. And for what? Wellwood wandered around like a lost soul and his turnover at the opposition blueline led directly to a penalty by Pavol Demitra. Washington got a power-play goal by Alexander Semin, breaking a 1-1 tie 15 minutes into the game, and the Caps never looked back.
Hold on for a second. There is one line in Gallagher's opinion that I agree with:
Then again, maybe they were so bad nothing would have mattered.
Exactly. That team as a whole was flat and on their heels as soon as the puck was dropped. I would wager on it being from the 2-game war against Calgary and then the minute break between that and having to travel to Washington to play a fired-up Capitals squad. I wasn't totally surprised by the Canucks' crumbling. I just didn't think it would go on for 60 minutes.
I agree with Vigneault's decision for 2 reasons:
1. He was trying to match Washington's skill.
2. Wellwood is going to get his chances to play on occasion whether some people like it or not.
There is no need to panic. There's no need to second-guess the coach after that loss.
There is no need to question Rob Davison's play in place of the injured Bieksa either.
The biggest issues now will be revealed in Detroit on Thursday. The Canucks will have had a break (3 days) and will have something to prove. I expect a great effort from them against the Wings. The issue? Line 2. At some point, the Pyatt-Demitra-Raymond line is either going to click or fold. If it doesn't shape up, what the hell is Vigneault going to do? Does he bench Pyatt or Raymond and give Krog or Ouellet a shot? At least those guys would show some heart, and maybe even hit the net. There is nothing going right for that line right now and it needs to get going if the Canucks are to have any sustained success.
Until then, forget the loss to the Caps. Chalk it up as a stinker. I can't wait to see the game against the Wings.
Oh, and ignore Negative Tony.

T Tags:

Labels:

2 Comments:

At October 15, 2008 at 3:10 AM , Anonymous GZ Expat said...

For once I may agree with you...

Demitra was shite. Compare him to Naslund all you want...but what I saw last night was no where near Naslund. If Viggy is so big on two way players...why on earth is he playing Demitra?

I have thought that Pyatt has played OK...he is skating and getting in front of the net...Demitra is so friggin far away from the net, Pyatt can't do anything.

As for Raymond...he's a kid...he gets a break.

So, the question would be less about Wellwood and the Demitra line...and more about, what about Pettinger? He could have made a difference against his old club, me thinks. I don't think the guys you mentioned have that...too small. Pettinger has size.

http://www.winnipegsun.com/Sports/Hockey/2008/10/15/7087716-sun.html

But, I gotta say, I like the Canucks speed against Calgary...they just didn't work hard enough against Washington. They got bumped and out hustled to every puck. Do you think we will see the same against Detroit...possibly, because Detroit makes other teams look bad all the time.

 
At October 15, 2008 at 7:37 AM , Blogger Sean Zandberg said...

"If Viggy is so big on two way players...why on earth is he playing Demitra?"

Because his boss aquired him, so he has to. Sad isn't it?

I think the Canucks will show up against Detroit for sure. Don't they always?
Pettinger wouldn't be a bad option, you're right.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Waiting For Stanley was created in June 2006.